Foetry.Com
September 01, 2014, 09:48:43 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Foetry.Com v.2 Forum Archive Through May 2007
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Be More Welcoming  (Read 5958 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kate Bernadette Benedict
Newbie
*
Posts: 34



WWW
« on: May 30, 2005, 12:42:58 PM »

The member calling himself Vincent is a literature professor who loves poetry, and teaching, and he strongly supports the contest reform that is the reason this board exists.  He's made some good points, asked fertile questions, and gave us a sense of the academic's dilemma.  Yes he came across as condescending here and there; the person without sin please throw the first stone.

Too bad Vincent felt so hounded that he walked away.  It seems to me the board would greatly benefit by the presence of academics and insiders.  I doubt if we "outsiders" have a patent on dissent on issues such as the contest system, the MFA system, the aesthetic du jour.   We need to welcome allies from all quarters.  

Therefore, would those indulging their worst natures with ad hom vitriolics and adversarial us-and-them orthodoxy, please put a sock in it!?
Logged

i]I gotta lotta livin' to do.[/i]
Wilson
Newbie
*
Posts: 768



« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2005, 04:28:49 PM »

Quote from: "Kate Bernadette Benedict"
The member calling himself Vincent is a literature professor who loves poetry, and teaching, and he strongly supports the contest reform that is the reason this board exists.  


SAYING you are a literature professor and actually holding that title are two different things.   That aside, he was on here long enough to know how the board works.  He also said he was leaving because he was sure someone would attack him for his position.  This after he called someone an "idiot."  If you throw shit in a monkey house, expect to get shit throw back at you.  Or if you like Forest Gump: Civil is as civil does.
Logged

his is the abyss--quit staring!

Wils
Crimson
Newbie
*
Posts: 176


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2005, 05:33:36 PM »

Quote from: "Kate Bernadette Benedict"
The member calling himself Vincent is a literature professor who loves poetry, and teaching, and he strongly supports the contest reform that is the reason this board exists. ............

Too bad Vincent felt so hounded that he walked away. .........

We need to welcome allies from all quarters.  



Kate, please. Vincent is a priest who loves the church, the institution, the power he derives from it.  He showed up to tell us to overlook the child molesters and got pelted with eggs instead of being beatified. He tried his powerplay on us and it didn't work, so he scurried away huffing and puffing.  Instead of benefiting from our moral clarity, he felt scorched by it, offended by it.  Foetry.com does not need allies.  Truth does.  And Vincent was allergic to it.
Logged

enata Dumitrascu
Kate Bernadette Benedict
Newbie
*
Posts: 34



WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2005, 06:14:28 PM »

Far be it from me to defend someone who calls others idiots;  the word "idiot" was bandied about on that thread but not by Vincent.  Vincent did not engage in ad hom attacks.

On the chance that I misread his posts, I went back and reread every word he wrote.  He made intelligent points and he raised some questions.  Raising questions need not be received as "making accusations."  Those who love dissent ought to allow dissent too. Yes?  And his was a rather quiet dissent, if you ask me.  

Well, Wilson, I admit I didn't doubt Vincent's credentials as a professor of literature, though he misspelled "schmooze" and "cachet" and that's kinda sad.   He has been one of the more forthcoming members, revealing many details about his life experiences.  He says he has a book coming out from my publisher but fyi I don't know him; I'm not trying to defend a crony or anything.  The situation just struck me as a typical example of an ongoing problem with the board and one I dearly wish could be solved in foetry.com's new incarnation.  

Renata, your characterization of this man seems to me extremely jaundiced and unfair.  Those who want more fairness in this world ought to extend it in this world.  Yes?
Logged

i]I gotta lotta livin' to do.[/i]
Matt
Administrator
*****
Posts: 1063



WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2005, 08:50:14 PM »

Kate,

I stand by everything I said both to and about Vincent (specifically in my post after he bid adieu), and I don't really have anything to say on those issues beyond that.

Frankly, I would have been happy if he stayed around.  He just proposed what should have been a new topic, and it seemed like he half wanted to participate . . . although it became quite clear he wasn't really here to share and humble himself to our level.

I have no objection to arguing or discussing poetry with conservatives or insiders.  None at all.  But I am not going to censor my opinions.  I think that's not a worthwhile approach for this forum and the topics discussed here.

Also, I'm the one always throwing around the word dissent, and I stand by what I said.  From the OED:
Quote
dissent

  • verb 1 express disagreement with a prevailing or official view. 2 disagree with the doctrine of an established or orthodox Church.

  • noun the holding or expression of a dissenting view.

  — ORIGIN Latin dissentire ‘differ in sentiment’.


Vincent, from what I have seen, was expressing views that were "prevailing", "official", "established", and "orthodox".  It is my understanding of the connotation of the word dissent (as the definition above supports) that it is reserved for disagreements with views that are "prevailing", "official", "established", and "orthodox", and is not normally applied to the disagreement of those who hold views "prevailing", "official", "established", and "orthodox" with those who dissented against such views (as Vincent himself claimed).

Of course, no one holds a patent on dissent, but it is one of the only tools of the disempowered, of the outsider.  It is a moral tool; it's not belligerent in nature.  It's merely the disagreement of the disenfranchised outsider with the way she/he is treated by the empowered insider.  It's up to all of us to have the integrity to make our dissent as valid and potent as it can be . . . but we are not gods, not flawless.  We will surely fall victim to being human.  But this doesn't invalidate either our dissent or our inclination to dissent.

As for the value of dissent, I have personally found Noam Chomsky both enlightening and moving (despite his rationalism), and would highly recommend the reading of his writings or the partaking of his many interviews, primarily for their excellence, but very secondarily, to orient oneself to my usage of the term dissent and my other "revolutionary rhetoric" (much of which is cribbed from Chomsky) should it confuse or fall into vaguery.

One last thing regarding Vincent.  I took offense at the manner he chose to interact with me (i.e., by pretending I didn't exist and was not worth replying to).  I pointed this out to him, and predictably, he said nothing.

I intend to stick around, at least until I'm voted off the island.  I'm not going to scurry off into a little burrow of moralistic security, spewing condescension over my shoulder as I leave.  I am flatly saying that I am not better than anyone here in any way, nor do I feel like I am wasting my time spent here.  I see us all as equals who may have differing background and opinions, but who share an interest in the subject of poetry and the culture surrounding it.

Beyond that, debate, disagreement, and argument can only serve the good.  Tempers may even flare and a few insults will be hurled.  This happens.  But insults are really of little significance.  Sweeping dismissals, on the other hand, are supremely arrogant and offensive.

Quote from: "Kate Bernadette Benedict"
We need to welcome allies from all quarters.


Kate, I think allies of any inclination should be welcomed (and have been for the most part), but when someone asks us to accept him/her on the condition that we sacrifice our critical integrity and any right whatsoever to opinions that do not accord with his/hers, then I for one do not call this person an ally.

I would love to see po-profs and PoBiz insiders jumping ship and slumming it with us unwashed heathens, but before these hypothetical allies do this, they will have to become either dissenters themselves or at least become capable of tolerating and considering the dissent of others.  One thing I feel adamant about is that we should tolerate no condescension and power politicking from the holy insiders who have sojourned here to save our souls and convert us to the one true religion of Po.

So if any true allies from the biz ever show up, I would love to plot with them how to take back poetry from the inside.

Quote from: "Kate Bernadette Benedict"
Therefore, would those indulging their worst natures with ad hom vitriolics and adversarial us-and-them orthodoxy, please put a sock in it!?


If we end up resorting to name calling instead of useful argument (which can be vitriolic, adversarial, demonstrative, parodic, satirical, even absurd) we are only harming ourselves and the good that Alan has done, but no sock should ever be stuffed in anyone’s mouth, no matter how outraged the rhetoric it spews.  We need our outrage, our vitriol, our dissent.  Without them, we are neutered and silenced.  That’s what the rhetoric of power wants, and I am quite happy to see our civil disobedience raging away.  Some may criticize Vincent, provoking you to criticize them in return, and then me to stand up for them/us in opposing your criticism . . . which strikes me as all good, all perfectly healthy.  It’s a good community dynamic, especially since we are dealing with unanswerables much of the time.

Which is, of course, merely my opinion blubbering out, nary a sock in sight.

Yours,
Matt
Logged

Funk not only moves, it can RE-move, dig?"
      --Sir Lollipop Man (Alias, the Long-Haired Sucker)
mallie
Newbie
*
Posts: 83



« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2005, 10:14:01 PM »

Welcome, smelcome.

Ad hominem attacks rule.
Logged

allie Urn


"I'm a bitch, I'm a bitch
and the bitch is back"
TheMadPen
Newbie
*
Posts: 10


« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2005, 06:06:44 PM »

Quote from: "Kate Bernadette Benedict"
<<Too bad Vincent felt so hounded that he walked away.  It seems to me the board would greatly benefit by the presence of academics and insiders.>>

Yes, I agree. Not all academics are bad, or wrong. In fact, we need to hear all sides before any of us can even begin to find a solution to the problem. It's certainly going to take the cooperation of all of us. I think when we join any forum though, we need to learn to roll with the punches. There are always those who play rough. But in order to make any progress, it would be nice if everyone could state their opinions without some getting all bent out of shape....    
Logged

-A poem is a song of words,
taking us wherever the heart may roam;
A song is words put to music,
And sometimes, music put to a poem.--
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!